Why You Should Bring a Bible on Sunday

Thanks for all the responses to the survey on Why Don’t You Bring Your Bibles on Sunday? It’s good to see so many people reading the Bible. Several of you questioned the importance of reading your Bible during a sermon, especially if we have PowerPoint. Here are a few reasons why I think it is important to read along:

It allows the Bible to make up your mind about meaning, not you make up your own mind about the meaning. Having a Bible in front of you (electronic or hardcopy), allows you to read and refer to the passage as a complete thought. Reading it in complete allows you to compare the reasoning of the preacher to the reasoning of Scripture. We can follow the argument of Scripture, not just the argument of the preacher. Instead of making up your mind about the Bible, let the Bible make up your mind about the Bible.

Follow the argument of Scripture, not just the argument of the preacher.

Consider the example of the Bereans who thought about Paul’s teachings by “examining the Scriptures daily” (Acts 17:11). They respectfully compared Paul to the OT. Paul himself taught the Roman churches to be “convinced in their own mind” before God regarding interpretation and application of Scripture (Rom 14:5). By reading Scripture during a sermon, we can follow the biblical admonition to be persuaded through our own study, not merely relying on second-hand interpretation, as good as it may be.

It allows you to read the Bible in context. Reading the Bible in context is critical. Preachers often preach out of context and distort the meaning of the text. Sometimes this results in right doctrine from the wrong texts, other times it results in wrong doctrine from right texts.

When we read in context we get to see the Bible, not in bits and pieces, but as an awe-inspiring whole.

Context is king; it dictates meaning of a verse or passage. For instance, if you took my sentence “Context is king” out of context, you could argue that I was saying literary context is more important than Jesus, and thus, the Bible should be our king, not Christ. That’s not what I meant at all, and the reason you know this is from the surrounding context. When we read in context we get to see the Bible, not in bits and pieces, but as an awe-inspiring whole. This whole, grand, cohesive story convinces, moves, instructs, and blesses us.

It helps you avoid confusing the medium for the message. The medium we access Scripture from varies—oral sermons and stories, printed books, electronic screens, searchable databases, video projection. The mere fact that the technological achievements of the printing press and electronic projection weren’t available in the 1st century, and that Scripture was largely read aloud among those churches, doesn’t tell us that we should or should not use books or powerpoint. However, if that medium affects our interpretation of the message, then we should rethink the medium.

Reading in PowerPoint prevents us from seeing the Bible in complete thoughts that hang together as a grand story.

Marshal McLuhan is famous for coining the saying: “the medium is the message”. Here is an interesting example of the medium dictating the message. When I was reading the Bible this morning, I thought to myself “How can I communicate this in a tweet?” For a moment, I tried to distill a very deep theological concept into a 160 character phrase. The limited character string medium of Twitter was forcing me to shave off important bits of theology just so I could communicate a brief, pithy statement. Not only is this silly, it can distort the message. The medium becomes the message by affecting what we say, how we say it, and how it is understood!

One concern with relying on Scripture projection on Sundays is that it limits our reading to bits and pieces, isolated from context. Apart from having Bibles ourselves, we’re unable to read the passage as a whole. We forsake the critical insight that comes from seeing the Bible as complete thoughts that hang together in context. The medium of PowerPoint requires a truncated message, a constant flow of appearing and disappearing Scriptures at the preacher’s whim. By not bringing some form of the Bible on Sundays, we can be subtly believe a set of unintended messages:

  • You don’t need to read your Bible
  • The way you read the Bible doesn’t matter (isolated or in context).
  • Take the preacher’s word over God’s Word.

Concluding Thoughts

My ultimate aim in the survey and in this post is not to make people bring Bibles to Sunday Gatherings or City Groups (though I think it is wise). A separate post would easily be written on the value of listening to sermons well, and with an open heart to hear from God’s Spirit. My aim is that we would all read our Bibles regularly and well, so that we can clearly understand our faith, consistently see the futility of our idolatry in the presence of Christ, and embrace the train of graces that come to us through a proper understanding of the Bible. So bring your Bibles (and more importantly read them), not to be religious but to be reasonable, not to become doctrinaire but to be devotional, not to be archaic  but to be  awe-inspired.

Preaching: PowerPoint or Bibles?

In recent research Ed Stetzer examined 450 sermons, with the help of a team, and asked some interesting questions. In particular, he posed: “Do you start [your sermons] with the text or the [listeners] context?” 37% of preachers said they start with context to connect with their audience first, but at closer analysis it was actually over 50%.

Which is Better: Text or Context?

There are pros and cons to starting with either text or context. When we start with text, we reinforce the centrality of God’s word over the preacher’s opinion. We can call people to open their Bibles and follow along. When we start with context, we connect with the listener right away, at a felt need level, and can lead them to the relevancy of the Bible.

Does PowerPoint Reduce Dependence on the Bible?

I typically introduce my sermons with a brief connection to the listener’s context, pray, and then start the sermon. While I think this is good, Stetzer’s comments regarding PowerPoint enriched some of our recent thinking about sermon delivery. Stetzer has almost stopped using PP. Why? People begin to depend on it, not their Bibles.

People at Austin City Life don’t bring or follow along in their Bibles enough. I’m not sure why, so I started an online survey to find out. I think they depend on PowerPoint. I’m glad that some people don’t bring their Bibles because they aren’t even Christians. The fact that they are reading the Bible on a screen is better than not reading Scripture at all. But, there are other ways around that.

I may start using PP less and less. At the start of 2010 we are making a very clear point about the necessity of bringing Bibles to our gatherings, not to be religious but to be reasonable, to reason through Scripture yourself, and not just ping single texts off of a screen. Reading your Bible during a sermon can help you in several ways:

  1. Focus on the sermon.
  2. Understand the Bible.
  3. Read the passage in its larger context.
  4. Test the pastor’s message against the authoritative message of Scripture.
  5. Allow you to cross reference what he says with other portions of Scripture.

But a lot of people don’t bring or read their Bibles during sermons. Marshal McLuhan is famous for saying: “the medium is the message”, and I believe one of the unintended messages traveling through our PP medium is you don’t need to read your Bible. Isolated texts on a screen is good enough. That is an awful message, one contradicted by the message of Scripture itself (Ps 19, 119; 2 Tim 3:16).

Why Don't You Bring Your Bible on Sundays?

I’ve noticed very few Bibles in our Sunday gatherings. I hear very little rustling of pages while I am preaching. This has got me thinking. I’m curious. If you don’t bring your Bible on Sunday, why not?


Tangible Kingdom Primer

As a member of the VERGE social media team, I recently received The Tangible Kingdom Primer, an 8 week study to put incarnational missional community to practice. The Primer seems eminently helpful, and has been used by megachurch Austin Stone, host to VERGE, to promote missional community in their own church.

As Halter & Smay point out, when a church grows, slowly or by leaps and bounds, something is needed to continually reproduce your missional values. Their response was the Primer.

The Primer offers helpful exercises, thought-provoking questions, and insightful comments along the way. Here are a smattering of those:

  • The reason we struggle to live a missional life is that it pulls against every natural fiber, sin, rhythm, habit, muscle, and thought pattern we’re used to. viii
  • Right now, what is hindering you from living a missional life?
  • Imagine what could change if the Good news of Jesus was allowed to shape and inform all the area of our lives.
  • What personal interests and hobbies can you turn into communal ones?

Although the Primer is highly structured, it provides very practical help in cultivating missional communities. On the other hand, I find it difficult to imagine our church working through a 200 page primer (I thought primers were supposed to be short!). In the end, every pastor and leader must find the methods that best suit their people and their context. No doubt the TK Primer will be a good one for many!