Seeing through Frankenstein

Watching del Toro’s Frankenstein, I was struck by Victor’s description of his creation as “obscene, monstrous, grotesque.” a horror to behold. It was uncomfortable to hear the creator speak of his creation in such unrestrained invective. The creature’s longing for companionship and love made this especially painful to watch as he responds to Victor, “I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe. If I cannot satisfy one, I will indulge in the other” (Shelly).

The tense relationship between creator and creature, which is eventually cast as father and son, invites us to explore “the chain of pain” in familial relationships, identifying good longings that go unfulfilled. While it is unfair to reduce this relationship to a single metaphor, there are insights to be gleaned by looking at Frankenstein from various angles.

The Father-Son Relationship

The first insight is on the nose–the power of the father-son relationship. It has the power to destroy and to lift up, to demoralize and to empower. Every son longs for the approval of his father, even those who already possess the approval of a good father. We are made to enjoy the sun of our dad’s delight, to live in the confidence of what he thinks of us, and yet, every father fails to do this adequately. We cannot do it consistently or deeply enough–we are made to rest in the approval of a greater Father.

The Image of Self

A second insight comes from the observation I made earlier–the discomfort of Victor’s description of his creation: obscene, monstrous, grotesque. The twist comes when we realize that Victor is looking at an image of himself. The hubris-filled creator cannot settle for anything less than perfection (when the creature did not immediately learn to speak, Victor deems him unintelligent.) The grotesque appearance of his creation is a reflection of his own depravity–a lust for creative glory and success.

The Creator become Disfigured Creature

It is here that we are invited to see ourselves. As Del Toro says, “I am the monster,” his film in part a commentary on humanity’s capacity for evil. We all snub, gossip, slander, silently hate, and worse. We have a grotesque dimension to our humanity. Thinking about this, I found this description stunning:

he had no form or majesty that we should look upon him, and not beauty that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by men; a man of sorrows and acquainted by grief; and as one from whom men hide their faces (Isaiah 53:2-3)

This ushers in the third insight. In looking at the creature, we not only see ourselves but also the Creator. Christ, the one in whom all things are made, embraces a form from which men hide their faces. Marred beyond recognition at the cross, Jesus wears our depravity and endures our rejection. Why? To reunite Father and son, Creator and daughter, God and humanity.

For this reason, the closing scene of Frankenstein pulls on our deepest longings–to be forgiven and restored, our image renewed and the father’s love enjoyed. In Christ, the distorted son forgives fallen fathers and mothers, men and women, that we may truly live.

Discipleship in the Local Church – Part 2

In my first post we explored the importance of centering discipleship in the gospel and structuring discipleship with flexibility. Then, we examined three primary environments for discipleship. In this post, we will take a close look at how to draw a line from what centers discipleship (a gospel-centered approach to Scripture) to what structures discipleship (various forms that can form a pathway).

The phrase “discipleship pathways” has become very popular with churches. It is typically used to express a desire to become intentional in making disciples of Jesus. This resolve is commendable but unless the pathway is robustly informed by Scripture, and centered in the gospel, our forms for disciple making will quickly become rigid, hyperspiritual, and legalistic, forming people away from Christ, e.g. being a disciple means observing these 9 habits, sharing the gospel in this particular way, being emotionally healthy. Therefore, it is critical to not only develop a discipleship pathway but ground it in the gospel of grace.

Centering our Structures

How do we center discipleship in the various church environments?

  • Classroom: This environment informs the disciple. It is “teaching” them to observe all that Christ commanded, and Christ taught that the Law, the Psalms. and the Prophets have their fulfillment in him (Lk 24:44).
    • Bible Studies: The sermons, classes, and seminars need to be grounded not only Scripture but also in the person and work of Jesus. For example, it isn’t adequate to have a Bible Study on the Book of Daniel. We need to ground our hope in Son of Man, not in figuring out the “signs of the times.” Otherwise, people will attach their spiritual significance to cracking the end-time code rather than the return of the Son of Man.
    • Sermons: Many sermons contain exegetical insights, historical nuance, theological reflection, and still fall short of expounding the gospel. If the gospel is not in the text, it is always in the context. Thus, we should always examine a text in light of the greater gospel context. What is the passage saying about God and his saving grace? We are not making students but disciples of Jesus.
    • We can discern the gospel of grace in the text/context by looking for (For more on this see GCD, 146-150):
      • Person and work of Christ: the cross, resurrection, ascension, intercession
      • Gospel Metaphors: justification, adoption, new creation, atonement, & union with Christ, suffering servant, the Rock, pearl of great price, treasure in a field.
      • Actions of Christ: advocates, forgives, cleanses, transforms, obeys.
      • Types of Christ: 2nd Adam, David, Abraham. The true Temple, Lamb, etc.

 

  • Community:. This environment integrates disciples with one another. It is teaching “them to observe” all that Christ commanded. We cannot obey Christ apart from the Body of Christ. His teaching requires meaningful relationship with others. We cannot love, forgive, encourage, serve, and so without a community. Thus, the community is the context in which we are formed together, where we get to witness the love, grace, power, forgiveness, and service of Christ at work among us. But how do we make community structures gospel-centered? Too many small groups settle for social groups, Bible knowledge groups, gossip groups.
    • Small Groups: Many churches provide sermon discussion guides that simply walk people through the sermon or biblical text without ever getting the gospel. As a result, the community can feel lifeless and academic. We have to intentionally structure the questions to get to the heart idols, concerns, and tensions. Only when these are surfaced can we apply the gospel to one another. This is when change happens! See resources like Gospel-Centered Life
    • One-on-One: One-on-one mentoring can often devolve into passing on best practices instead of a formative encounter with the person and work of Christ. In order for discipleship groups or mentoring to transform, the mentor or leader needs to intentionally connect life aspirations and struggles to the gospel of grace by: 1) Listening to their Story 2) Empathizing with their Story 3) Retelling the Story around Jesus.

 

  • Culture: This environment invites us to intentionally spread the gospel. It is making disciples “of all nations” not “from all nations.” We aren’t sent to extract people from the world into a Christian enclave, but to take the gospel into a cultural context. However, some Christians attempt to do this combatively, trying to conquer secular people’s politics and ethics, leaving them stranded with words of condemnation but no salvation. Alternatively, Christians can respond to culture passively, simply absorbing the views of the world around them and smuggling them into the church. Instead of taking a combative or passive stance against culture, we must intentionally engage the people, beliefs, and values around us with the gospel of grace. I recommend an ARC approach:
    • Affirm: Validate cultural concerns and affirm secular values that align with Christianity. Build bridges not burn them.
    • Redeem: Redeem secular impulses and values with the gospel. Show the difference Christ makes on an issue.
    • Confront: Explain why a particular issue is not good for humanity and demonstrate how the biblical alternative is for their flourishing.