Philosophical Secularism vs. Political Secularism

In an interesting session at the Pew Foundation’s Conference on religion and public life, professor Wilfred McClay addresses the role of secularism in the U.S. He notes that we possess a unique blend of secularism and religion. He clarifies the difference between philosophical secuarlism and political secularism by expoloring the notion that “If you know only your own religion, you don’t even know your own religion.”

He comments: Also, there’s a problem with the word “secularism.” It means so many different things. [But] the distinction I want to make is between philosophical secularism, which is secularism as a kind of godless system of the world, a system of beliefs about ultimate things, and secularism in a political sense: that is, secularism as recognizing politics as an autonomous sphere, one that’s not subject to ecclesiastical governance, to the governance of a church or religion or the church’s expression of that religion. A secular political order may be one in which religious practice or religious exercise, as we say, can flourish.

Read the rest.

Coaching

I am currently reading Coaching 101 by Bob Logan & Sherilyn Carlton. It offers very practical advice on how to coach church planters effectively, including various coaching scenarios and helpful examples. The advice is so simple it almost dismissable, until you realize how these basic approaches to coaching are essential:

  1. Coaching is less about being an expert and more about being a support.
  2. Coaching is asking good questions, not providing great answers.
  3. When asking questions, invite, summarize, get the planter to go beyond initial answers, clarify what you think they are saying.
  4. Celebrate good stuff, press for clarity on obstacles, clarify where the planter wants to go, obtain a commitment for follow through.